I find it pretty easy to believe God abides by the rules we humans set for him/her/it. That general ambiguity of belief and experience of god is proof that it is an invention of mankind. God doesn’t exist.
There’s no reason not to believe in genetics and God at the same time. Fact is, God created genetics. People assume that science is a set of rules that God has to abide by. Truth is, science is a set of rules that God created. So believing in science is not antiGod. Believing that science invented itself IS.
doing its magic. It’s just like a straw doesn’t ‘know’ to let water go up when you suck on it, physics just does its job and the water goes up.
Likewise, the RNA probably just gets sucked out, I assure you the RNA on its own doesn’t ‘know’ to do it.
Of course, the way I see it, there’s no logical way people can believe science is a process that invented itself. The more you learn about science, the more you realize there has to be an intelligent designer behind it all.
Hi there! I’m pretty bad at biology, but here’s my view on it. Being subcell molecules, they’re not able to think (in fact, most microscopic living things are incapable of thought too, as they have no brains). My guess is that it’s a physical attraction, such as that of magnets and gravity. The amino acids are probably charged in such a way that it’s attracted into the ‘hole’ of a ribosome. Enzymes probably play a role too. As for RNA, it doesn’t “know”, it’s probably just diffusion
To define a god is to need one. There is certainly no evidence for one. My need to lob insults is based on the evidence of nincompoopery. Nincompoop! Seriously the standard of your English is terrible. Do they put thtoopid in the water in Canada?
I like how you assumed what I believe, and what I apply god to. Not to mention no one claimed that god was an answer to a problem unsolved. They merely said something along the lines of, “Wow it’s amazing how god made use” or “Wow how can you doubt there is a god after seeing something like this?” and you flipped your lid. It is illogical to try and prove metaphysics. But it is not illogical that it is metaphysical. Your need to lob insults proves you’re a pseudo-intellectual congrats!
Do you understand it? Science does not disprove god. Simple as that. No amount of ranting will make it do so.
How stupid would it be for god to create a universe that required his presence?
sounds like you have a problem with meanings! I’m sure I am pretentious, tough if you don’t like it!! but meaning is in the eye of the bestower, tough again!! I’ll take any prize I can get! cool!!!
25 Responses to Molecular Visualizations of DNA
goatmilk222
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
I think it may have to do with chemicals telling the RNA where to go.
goatmilk222
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
There is no proof that he does or doesn’t exist. That is a very weak argument for “proof”
b1gg5y
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
Fact is, God created genetics !!!!!!!
Does the bible say that aswell…… wise up
nickohlus
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
I find it pretty easy to believe God abides by the rules we humans set for him/her/it. That general ambiguity of belief and experience of god is proof that it is an invention of mankind. God doesn’t exist.
youarepwned
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
There’s no reason not to believe in genetics and God at the same time. Fact is, God created genetics. People assume that science is a set of rules that God has to abide by. Truth is, science is a set of rules that God created. So believing in science is not antiGod. Believing that science invented itself IS.
youarepwned
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
doing its magic. It’s just like a straw doesn’t ‘know’ to let water go up when you suck on it, physics just does its job and the water goes up.
Likewise, the RNA probably just gets sucked out, I assure you the RNA on its own doesn’t ‘know’ to do it.
Of course, the way I see it, there’s no logical way people can believe science is a process that invented itself. The more you learn about science, the more you realize there has to be an intelligent designer behind it all.
youarepwned
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
Hi there! I’m pretty bad at biology, but here’s my view on it. Being subcell molecules, they’re not able to think (in fact, most microscopic living things are incapable of thought too, as they have no brains). My guess is that it’s a physical attraction, such as that of magnets and gravity. The amino acids are probably charged in such a way that it’s attracted into the ‘hole’ of a ribosome. Enzymes probably play a role too. As for RNA, it doesn’t “know”, it’s probably just diffusion
Ckordobah
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
Religion !!!
hwwolverine
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
it’s their function….
repatte
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
Thanks for proving my point by building a strawman. Good day to you sir =).
FoxyFreddie
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
To define a god is to need one. There is certainly no evidence for one. My need to lob insults is based on the evidence of nincompoopery. Nincompoop! Seriously the standard of your English is terrible. Do they put thtoopid in the water in Canada?
repatte
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
I like how you assumed what I believe, and what I apply god to. Not to mention no one claimed that god was an answer to a problem unsolved. They merely said something along the lines of, “Wow it’s amazing how god made use” or “Wow how can you doubt there is a god after seeing something like this?” and you flipped your lid. It is illogical to try and prove metaphysics. But it is not illogical that it is metaphysical. Your need to lob insults proves you’re a pseudo-intellectual congrats!
thechessstick
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
Hi Dara. You aren’t very scientific in your thinking, are you?
FoxyFreddie
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
Nearly as stupid as using the premise “god” to answer anything you are too foolish to try to understand.
2000 years ago it was “Why do we have plagues” – God did it
You are the equivalent nincompoop of those times… congrats!
Science doesn’t need to disprove God… God needs proof first.
shaggyjam
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
How does the amino acids know to go inside the ribosome?
How do they get in there with the right orientation in space so that the ribosome can work?
Its like throwing a key accross the room and it ends up in a key hole and unlocks a door.
How does the Rna know to snake out of that little hole in the nucleus to get into the cytoplasm, so that it can get translated?
How does the ribosome know to clamp to the RNA to start making proteins? How does it find it?
Egendomlighet
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
Daraxzaraz: “a perfect machine”
yes, except for all those people whose bodies are so messed up, they need a highly trained mechanic (a doctor) to fix them
repatte
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
Do you understand it? Science does not disprove god. Simple as that. No amount of ranting will make it do so.
How stupid would it be for god to create a universe that required his presence?
Daraxzaraz
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
evolution is not a religion, is a FACT…
FoxyFreddie
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
English repatte… do you speak it?
FoxyFreddie
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
Another classically dumb non-sequitur from thechessdick.
repatte
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
Everything you just said is false, apparently it’s not so easy anymore. I’ll tell you why, because you cannot answer why.
sarabuffalo1
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
no conflict we are co-creators with god and nature
FoxyFreddie
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
Yeah I have a problem with being meaningful.. I’m all for it.
sarabuffalo1
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
Yes I loved it too, sooo amazing. Nature is soooo wonderful! what a community we.have inside us!
sarabuffalo1
December 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am
sounds like you have a problem with meanings! I’m sure I am pretentious, tough if you don’t like it!! but meaning is in the eye of the bestower, tough again!! I’ll take any prize I can get! cool!!!