What Is The Recommended Translation Of The Bible?

28 Oct
2009

What interpretation of the Holy Bible would we guys suggest for me, the 14-year-old boy, to read? And an reason of why.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • BarraPunto
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes Fr
  • BlogMemes Sp
  • blogtercimlap
  • De.lirio.us
  • description
  • eKudos
  • Global Grind
  • IndianPad
  • laaik.it
  • Leonaut
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • Live
  • Meneame
  • muti
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • NuJIJ
  • ppnow
  • Print this article!
  • Reddit
  • SalesMarks
  • Scoopeo
  • Segnalo
  • Shadows
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Symbaloo
  • Taggly
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • Tipd
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Upnews
  • Wists

Related posts:

  1. What Is The Best, Most Accurate Translation Of The Holy Bible Available In English? What is a most appropriate interpretation of a Bible if...
  2. What Is The Best Translation Of Les Miserables By Victor Hugo? I customarily review English Literature, since we am an Anglo-phone,...
  3. What Bible Translation Is Closest To The Original Hebrew/greek? I’ve listened Young’s Literal Translation though in a little ways...
  4. What Is The Easiest Translation Of Romeo And Juliet Book? I’m about to begin celebration of a mass Romeo as...
  5. What Is The Difference Between A Bible Translation, Paralell Or A Version? It seems to me which people would similar to a...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

29 Responses to What Is The Recommended Translation Of The Bible?

Avatar

I tell you whut!

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

The New World Translation is {relatively} easy to read and as accurate, if not more accurate than the best of other modern English Bible’s.
You can obtain one free of charge, and without any obligation whatsoever, from Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Avatar

get a free wii

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

One in your native language, preferably.
Of course, if you read anything other than ancient Greek or Aramaic, bear in mind that any non-Greek/non-Aramaic translation you read is going to take some things out of context, change a few words/meanings/connotations here and there… and that it’s best NOT to interpret everything it says, verbatim, word-for-word. Too many people do that, and that’s why we have thousands of denominations of Christianity now, and more appearing every day. One Bible you read might change the wording slightly from the last one you read… the important thing to remember is the overall meaning, not the literal interpretation… and that the Bible is meant to be a guide, not a literal book of modern law. Treat it with respect, but understand its history and the role it was meant to serve… hiding behind it as a means to cover deliberate bigotry is an affront to what the Bible is supposed to be.

Avatar

Tommieca

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

The King James Version of the Bible was translated to English under the scrutiny of a King. Other translators could easily make mistakes with no way to check for those mistakes. The KJV was translated near the time that William Shakespeare wrote his famous plays. When you become a High School Student you will be required to study and understand those plays. What does that have to do with the Bible you might ask? If you can read and study those plays then you should not have any problem reading and understanding the KJV Bible. God knew that was going to happen he did all that ahead of time for your convenience.

Avatar

loss of sleep

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

Tyndale Version,
Because its plain & simple to understand.
King James version was a spin off from Tyndale, james wanted to keep the people ignorant, because the principals in the Bible works.
However the only version is the new testament,William Tyndale was burned alive. King James version has much popularity. (wish i knew why)
Even if you don’t decide to read Tyndale version its still worth looking into as with all other versions. You have a lifetime of reading to do.

Avatar

WP Autoblog Plugin

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

The Century English Version, or
The New International Reader’s Version.
They aren’t literal; they’re freely translated — that is, they aren’t word-for-word translation; they’re thought-for-thought. Long sentences are broken down into shorter ones so that the flow of thought could be readily grasped. Wordings are light but not necessarily shallow.
Good for comprehensive reading but not for deeper study. I suggest you also have the English Standard Version for a side-by-side comparison.

Avatar

Marty

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

The KJV is a TRanslation of A translation not to accurate the translators of it didn’t even use it
The Translators of the 1611 KJV stated in the preface that they felt older the English versions already in existence before their translation were “good” and that “variations of translations is profitable” for finding out the true sense of the scriptures. The truth is translators of the King’s Bible didn’t trust there own version. For many Years after the completion of the translation, most of them chose to use other older translations [such as the Geneva, and Bishops Bible ].
“It was some time before men such as Miles Smith, Lancelot Andrewes, and others quoted from the Bible on which they had worked so diligently” (King James History, 1982, Pg 23)
One of the best example of this distrust the KJV translators had for there own 1611 translation is found in there preface (To the reader). Of the fourteen Bible quotes found in the preface of the 1611 none are even from KJV, they are direct citations the Geneva Bible.
“The title page of the Authorized Version announces that it is ‘appointed to be read in churches’, which is precisely right….The aim of this version, stated in the 1611 preface, ‘The Translators to the Reader’, was ‘to make a good one better’. that this refers to the Geneva Bible_ though for political reasons it could not be stated is clear from the fact that whenever in that long preface the Bible is quoted (fourteen times) the authors do not do so from their own translation, nor from the Bishops’ but from Geneva.” (From David Daniell’s preface to the modern spelling edition of the 1534 “Tyndale’s New Testament”, Copyright 1995, Page xiii)

Avatar

Mr. B (a.k.a. D. Troll)

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

If you’re really interested in learning about the Bible and how it came to us in its present form, I’d recommend reading any/all translations and comparing them with/against one another. And this might be hard for some Americans to believe, but don’t ever forget that it wasn’t originally written in English!!!!!

Avatar

reservatol

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

The King James Version has been the standard for 4+ centuries. It might be tough going, but one has to trust the spirit for helpful interpretation geared to your age and intellectual levels. Everything since then is just kind of a “me-too” effort and has a tendency to dilute or distort the original. Good luck, and congratulations on this very worthy project!

Avatar

Gay Christian

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

I love the New Living Translation – not to be confused with the Jehovah’s Witnesses version, the New World Translation (which despite some comments, is roundly condemned by scholars as biased, unaccurate and misleading, so even though it’s free – avoid it! A good rule of thumb is if you can’t get it in a Christian Bookshop, be wary of it.).
The NLT is very readable, it’s widely acclaimed as a good translation and is available in many study Bibles (e.g. the Life Application Study Bible). Other than that, the NIV is good – also very accurate and I used to use it all the time. For reading, try The Message which is a paraphrase of the Bible, so not good for serious study! You can read all these at BibleGateway.com

Avatar

Dylan the CATholic Teen

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

I prefer the New American Catholic bible.
The KJV is not 100% accurate, no matter what some people tell you.
I am sorry to say no translation can be 100% accurate.
A good Bible for a teenager would be: http://www.amazon.com/Catholic-Youth-Bib… That is the one I use. It has great notes.
It also has the seven books that the KJV and other Protestant bibles omit.
The KJV can be hard to understand with the old English.

Avatar

bindysdo

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

I was raised with the King James Version. With you being 14, I would suggest that you also have an age appropriate bible study guide. The bible is hard enough to understand as adults. Thats why, as you know, we have preachers, Sunday School, VBS etc….these are all tools to help with the understanding of the word and God

Avatar

BibleCho

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

OK, this should help immenselyhttp://www.bible-reviews.com/selector.ht…
Here are a couple of “reading level” chartshttp://www.sundayschoolresources.com/bib…http://www.christianbook.com/Christian/B…
If your reading skills are at least average for your age, you should have no problem with any bible *other* than these
ESV
KJV
NASB
NKJV
NRSV
RSV
I think one of the best for your age is the CEV Learning Biblehttp://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1585160…
It has really excellent explanatory notes – **unbiased** explanatory notes. Do the “look inside” thing and take a look at how the notes explain the text.
The CEV might be a *little* young for you. Here is the same thing in NIV (which might be a little advanced for you, but not if you’re a “good reader”)http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1585166…
Another really *popular* one is the NIV Quest – but I found the notes more biased than in The Learning Biblehttp://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?i…
E-mail me if you need more details or if you have any requirements that you have not mentioned in your question.
Jim

Avatar

Heavy Metal Music and Bands

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

I recommend the new world translation and look to this webpage for information whyhttp://www.watchtower.org/e/20080501a/ar…

Avatar

Annie

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

I would recommend what I have used… the King James/ Amplified parallel version.
The original translation with an easy to read, mostly accurate, self explanatory version.
Easy to understand!

Avatar

L.C.

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

NASB, NKJ, KJ, NIV, are all good. I would recommend NIV for a teenager because it is clear and easy to understand.

Avatar

We Wish to Buy Your Shoes

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

Try this one:http://www.lolcatbible.com/index.php?tit…
It speaks a language you can understand.

Avatar

Glen

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

I like the New International Version (NIV) It’s accurate and not in the language of King James.

Avatar

football gifts

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

KING JAMES version is the best, because its the closest to the original writings.

Avatar

Owldude

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

New international

Avatar

???????? Mother Nature ????????

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

Any of them.
They’re all just as ridiculous.

Avatar

Daniel

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

Standard English Version for this age.

Avatar

g3e2n753

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

I would recommend the New Kings James Version

Avatar

entiens2

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

I would highly recommend The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures. It is a more “modern” bible so it is not very difficult to read. It has a god Index which helps you to look up bible verses that match a topic or name you are looking for.It has the names of all the books in the bible and it tells you their authors and the time period in which they were written. Plus, it is one of the few bible translations in the world that actually uses God’s name, Jehovah, and not titles as in Lord. hope this helped.

Avatar

Tony of Santa Clarita

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

Thomas Jefferson translated the Bible, leaving out the irrational aspects and only including the moral issues he felt were pertinent. Contrary to most uninformed Americans, this country was not founded by Christians who believed in prayer and the divinity of Jesus. It was founded by deists that were total rationalists. Even Lincoln was not a Christian.
So, in my opinion, leave out the nonsense, and you might have a good read.

Avatar

abnehmen mit FitLine XXS

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

New Revised Standard Version. This is my recommendation, and I read the New Testament in the original Greek. The King James Version is not that accurate and it’s written in an older form of English and the words no longer mean the same thing.

Avatar

mitch t

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

King James. It was good enough to found the US on, and the only version not owned by man. No one can copyright the KJV, so it stands to say no man can own it. Then I ask, then who does? Go with KJV, you can’t go wrong with it,.

Avatar

wholesale swarovski crystals

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

Use the KJV, because the KJV is 100% accurate: http://www.justbible.com
And here’s a website that teaches the meaning of every verse of every Book in the Bible: http://www.soniclight.com/constable/note…
It is a very useful resource! :)

Avatar

Lord Sesshomaru of The Atheati

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

A 14 y/o should be discovering themselves rather than religion. God is not the answer. Enjoy your youth while you have it.

Avatar

WP Robot Wordpress Autoposter

October 28th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

“The Atheist Bible”

Comment Form

top